I’ve got a cabin home + garage / game room that are 60 yards apart. The garage is full of steel. The fiber optic laid (only 100Mbps) is coming into the Garage, and I want to extend the network to the Cabin Home. The LAN was phenomenally slow whenever a wired connection was involved, both on transferring files (wired to wired in the network, not internet, and wired to wireless!). The router reports 1GB connections on the wires, but they aren’t running anything like that. Oddly, it also reports a 100mb connection *on an empty port*. I assumed that was a firmware glitch, but maybe it’s more significant than that…

Fixed envrams exposed issue. Thanks to Quentin Kaiser from IoT Inspector Research Lab contribution. Primary Broadband : FibreNet (RJ45-Ehternet output directly available from ISP) – Practically Unlimited Data. So I want to replace at least one of the units with the AX1100 as the main router, with a wired connection (or a wireless wifi 6 connection) to my main machine. Brilliant article (as always), I really appreciate the insights you put into each article, and the real life scenarios.By the way, it doesn’t seem to matter if QoS is on or off–it makes zero difference for the wired ports. So I hope the GT-AX11000 is (much) better and I can use one of the RTs as a mesh point! Reply I’m thinking about pairing two ASUS WiFi 6 routers via Ethernet, and part away from the Ubiquiti NanoStation setup. Secondary : USB Based (4G SIM Card Mobile Data via Android Phone) – Annual Quota of Data – Always connected to charger and router.

The router uses a dual-core 1.8 GHz processor, 512 MB of RAM, and 256 MB of flash memory for processing power. It’s not the most potent router I’ve seen but still quite impressive considering its tiny physical size. Asus RT-AX92U: Hardware specifications I did this on a few items in my system which consists of three AX92u’s with stationary equipment that does not need the benefit of mesh handoff moving around the property such a desktop computers, wifi printers, thermostat, a split system in a garage, etc.. I’ve been told the S20 Ultra phone SOC has a lower total throughput of 1.77gbps so maybe that’s why it’s reporting 1.2gbps. The laptop should be reporting negotiated speed at 2.4gbps. WiFi AX200 adaptor drivers are the latest version, updated on 3 Mar 2021 to Version 22.40.0.7 In your expert opinion, would the RT-AX92U be better than the RT-AC86U? Is it worth the extra cost? I don’t mind spending a little more if it will future-proof my setup. We utilise this 802.11ax speed to transfer data between two RT-AX92U routers, realising the fastest WiFi speed before the compatible 11ax devices are available on the market. So you can enjoy the technology from the future now and still connect it with the latest 802.11ax devices when they come out in the near future.Clients which connect to the guest network can be viewed in the network map -->view list --> interface The router has no multi-gig port, but it does have Link Aggregation (both WAN and LAN sides) and Dual-WAN. The former enables you to combine two ports into a 2Gbps connection, and the latter allows for turning one of its LAN ports or a USB port into a second WAN connection. My other laptop is connected to 5GHz-1 and it reports negotiated speed of 866mpbs with no fluctuation Dong’s note: That’s right! You’re reading the updated review published on January 7, 2021, with tests done using the latest firmware that features AiMesh 2.0. The original review of this router first went live on February 20, 2020. It then only allows 2 channel smart connect. The only way I get 3 channel smart connect is to reset the router and configure without the node==without aimesh.