In England and Wales, that comprises the common law, together with various statutory provisions including, in particular, Part 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules 1998 (notably Practice Direction 6B). Certificate of the enforcement in Scotland or Northern Ireland of a money judgment of the High Court or of the County Court (s. In fact, as I understand it, it simply proposes an amendment to the 1982 Act, long awaited by those who want to pursue defaulting Greek debtors. However, the House may like to know how often and how effectively the Brussels Convention has operated in practice. Broadly, the Regulation gives the English court a narrower discretion to refuse a request than the 1975 Act.

At present the 2005 Hague Convention is only in force in five countries: Denmark, Mexico, Montenegro, Singapore, and the UK. RAKIA put its then CEO, Dr Khater Massaad, in charge of these plans who in turn appointed Mr Gela Mikadze to develop these opportunities.

Both Article 67 (and 69) and regulation 92 provide that courts in England and Wales will continue to apply the relevant EU rules on jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement of judgments which applied immediately before the end of the transition period (e. The system of enforcing judgments in this country is not too bad but there is always a struggle to keep it up to date and effective.

It was given the force of law in domestic law on 1 January 2021 by the Private International Law (Implementation of Agreements) Act 2020, which also amended the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments (Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements 2005) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 (SI 2018/1124). In addition, the claimant must also show that its claim has a reasonable prospect of success (CPR Rule 6. The injunction sought against Dr Cho must therefore be dismissed on the basis of the current provisions of the EC CPR.

I confirm I am a lawyer or work in a legal capacity, intend to use LexisNexis products for business purposes and agree with the terms and conditions. As noted by Sir Geoffrey Vos (in the minority), the Privy Council's obiter comments, while not binding on lower courts, present a " ground-breaking exposition of the law of injunctions", extending far beyond the scope of BVI law.