Finally we have a book that explains how the . . . Scots created the modern civilized values America and the Western world still uphold. This is a great book, one which is now even more relevant than ever."--Michael Barone, U.S. News & World Report, coauthor of The Almanac of American Politics Herman does a great job in painting a great historical context. This is particularly good for readers who may not be too keen on their British history. In this book, you will learn about the political/religious monarchical disputes between the House of Hanover and the House of Stuart and the Scottish infatuation with exiled British throne claimant Bonnie Prince Charlie. You will also learn about the Act of Union, which originally created the United Kingdom, and how Scotland was motivated to support it during a crushing economic depression. Finally, you will learn good context of the 13th/14th century Wars of Scottish Independence, including brief overviews of the celebrated Scottish warriors such as William Wallace (Braveheart) and Robert the Bruce as well as the Scottish bitterness over the English capture of the Stone of Scone. I love Scotland. Along with England it is the only overseas country I've toured. Perhaps my love was born when reading Robert Louis Stevenson, George Macdonald, Sir Walter Scott, John Buchan, and O. Douglas. Or listening to Alistair Begg and David Tennant. That said, I have never been able to gin up motivation to learn much —beyond the names David Hume and Adam Smith—regarding the Scottish Enlightenment. In this book, you will learn about the Scottish Enlightenment. In particular, you will learn about how Scotland, prior to its enlightenment, was dominated by the Presbyterian Church (called the "Kirk"). At this time, the Kirk routinely executed blasphemers and promoted the world-view that man is an inherently sinful creature who can never truly redeem himself. Fortunately, a great thinker named Francis Hutcheson promoted the idea that men are generally moral creatures and shifted the focus of philosophical inquiry towards matters of concern to individuals living on earth (e.g., how men can be moral, how men can coexist in a society, etc.) as opposed to focusing on God, Church or Monarchy. Thus with Hutcheson, argues Herman, was the beginning of the Scottish Enlightenment. Arthur L. Herman (born 1956) is an American popular historian. He currently serves as a senior fellow at Hudson Institute. [1] Biography [ edit ]

How the Scots Invented the Modern World”, by Review of: “How the Scots Invented the Modern World”, by

advocated liberty in the sphere of commerce and the global economy. Hume developed philosophical concepts that directly influenced James Madison and thus the U.S. Constitution. Herman elucidates at length the ideas of the Scottish Enlightenment and their worldwide impact. In 19th-century Britain, the Scottish Enlightenment, as popularized by Dugald Stewart, became the basis of classical liberalism. At the University of Glasgow, James Watt perfected the crucial technology of the Industrial Revolution: the steam engine. The "democratic" Scottish system of education found a home in the developing U.S. This is a worthwhile book for the general reader, although much of the material has been covered better elsewhere, most recently in T.M. Devine's magisterial The Scottish Nation: A History, 1700–2000Welsh, Irvine (January 19, 2002). "The flowers of Scotland". The Guardian. London. p.E5 . Retrieved September 1, 2009. In a volume more celebrative than contemplative, Herman reveals a chauvinism that presents an eerie smiley face.

How The Scots Invented The Modern World: The True Story of How The Scots Invented The Modern World: The True Story of

A lively intellectual life in the burgeoning cities of the Scottish lowlands put Scotland at the forefront of the 18 th century enlightenment. The Scottish Enlightenment was more practical and aligned with common sense than was the Enlightenment of the French philosophes. David Hume and Adam Smith are just two of the significant Scottish thinkers of this era. The works of Hume and of Smith (e.g. The Wealth of Nations) are still required reading today in the fields of philosophy and of economics. A key event which helped launch this flowering was an economic one. The 1690’s were an unusually cold decade, leading to famine and poverty in the more northern European countries like Scotland. Scottish trade and industry were constricted by the policies of England, their more powerful neighbor to the south. Other nations of Western Europe in the 1600’s had colonies in the Americas, which seemed to be a source of national wealth and influence. Scotland tried to found her own colony, called Darien, on the coast of the Isthmus of Panama. A huge fraction of the wealth of Scotland was invested in this venture. It failed, for various reasons, which was an economic disaster for the country.

In addition to these more modern items, Scots have been at the forefront of radical change in the arts, philosophy, architecture, politics, and religion for almost as long as recorded history. This book also tells the negative parts of Scottish history; the revolutions, uprisings, famines etc. You will also learn about the "colossus of roads" Thomas Telford, whose prodigious This led to a willingness on the part of the Scottish elite to surrender their independence in return for the chance to participate in commerce on the same terms as the English and under the protection of the Royal Navy. An Act of Union between the two kingdoms was approved in 1707. This led to a rise in prosperity and helped set in motion various influences of modernization.

How The Scots Invented the Modern World: The True Story of How The Scots Invented the Modern World: The True Story of

To be honest, I'm a reader of historical fiction not history per se. But I am such a huge fan of Diana Gabaldon's Outlander series that I bought this book to broaden my understanding of the events in her novels. paints a forceful portrait of the emergence of the postcolonial era in the fateful contrast—and Continue reading »How the Scots Invented the Modern World: The True Story of how Western Europe's Poorest Nation Created Our World & Everything in it a b Golf, Sarah F.; Mark Rotella; Lynn Andriani; Jeff Zaleski (September 24, 2001). "How the Scots invented the Modern World". Publishers Weekly. 248 (39): 77. You could argue that this makes Scotland largely responsible for the global financial crisis. Thanks a lot, Scotland.

How Scotland invented the modern world | Metro News How Scotland invented the modern world | Metro News

In the late 1980s and early 1990s, Herman taught at Sewanee: The University of the South, George Mason University, Georgetown and The Catholic University of America. He was the founder and coordinator of the Western Heritage Program in the Smithsonian's Campus on the Mall lecture series. [3] [4] HOW THE SCOTS INVENTED THE MODERN WORLD THE TRUE STORY OF HOW WESTERN EUROPE’S POOREST NATION CREATED OUR WORLD AND EVERYTHING IN IT In 2008, he added to his body of work Gandhi and Churchill: The Epic Rivalry that Destroyed an Empire and Forged Our Age, a finalist for the 2009 Pulitzer Prize for General Nonfiction. [5]

Become a Member

The Scots were heavily involved in the British Empire too. They helped to change social problems around the world. My favorite in this section was Charles Napier who, as governor of Sind in India, banned the practice of sutee, (burning a widow on her husband’s funeral pyre). When the local Brahmin priests protested that this was interfering with an important national custom, Napier replied, “My nation also has a custom. When men burn women alive, we hang them. Let us all act according to national custom.” Firstly, there was a large injection of rationalism into religious thinking by key prominant players. Equality of all before god, working to god's glory, and recognising god in the observable facts of nature were principles carried into the heart of Scottish society. Hunter, Joanna (December 15, 2002). "Freud's female side". The Observer. London. p.E5 . Retrieved September 1, 2009. Another difficulty with the book is its focus on Britain, America and, to a lesser extent, Australia, particularly with reference to 'the Scots' invention of the modern world' for there is scant mention of the rest of Europe, Asia, the Middle East or Africa apart from the impact of the British Empire. I think the modern day peoples of those continents might reasonably take issue with that.