Shining3D [ Einstar ] Handheld 3D Scanner with Built-in RGB Color Camera, 14 Fps Scanning Speed for 3D Printing, Healthcare, Art

Product Information

After I first learned about the 3D scanner and realized one of its important roles - converting real-life objects into 3D models - I had a question: How accurate is it? Like many people, once I learn about this technology, it is natural to start paying attention to what accuracy it can achieve because it certainly seems to be a simple and direct criterion to understand the quality of a scanner. Yet is this really the case? Here are all the facts about accuracy that you, as a person interested in 3D scanning, should know： This article will help you decide if you need an upgrade of your current configuration, or if you can run it without any hardware changes. Log in Shining 3D User Account from the pop-up window when launching EXStar and your device is just activated!

If your model compute capability is lower than 4.3 you will not be able to run it, and you will need a hardware upgrade, if the value is bigger than 4.3 you are able to use the scanner with that graphic card. We then set up the Einstar by plugging everything in. It comes with a two-in-one cable just like on more professional 3D scanners; the power cable plugs into the data cable, which is plugged into the scanner. Calibration One small downside: when you want to save a new project, you’re taken to the folder of your previous project. It’s a minor detail but a bit annoying over time! 3D scanning results Khmer lion New to SHINING 3D? Benefit from our early bird discount and save your EINSTAR for only 799USD/EUR in our webshop HERE.Once we were done with our two-point clouds (2 projects) and they were both cleaned up, we proceeded to align them to get the final mesh. The infrared light source of Einstar is friendly to human eyes. The Hair Mode helps to acquire more hair data, and shows the 3D data with authentic colors. It only took about 3 minutes 54 seconds to acquire the 3D data of the human body. As mentioned above, accuracy testing is generally performed in an ideal environment, it is easy to see that many factors can influence the results of an accuracy test, such as operator skill level, lab temperature and humidity, vibration, calibration, surface texture, surface color, part cleanliness, etc. To be able to capture the lion’s belly and feet, we split this scan into two projects. The auto alignment feature worked great, as did the hole-filling and texture remapping tools mentioned earlier. On the final 3D model, it’s difficult to tell which areas were automatically generated. Resolution is defining the point distance which the scanner is capturing. The smaller the distance, the higher the resolution, and more density points of the data for better detail.If you select low resolution, the point distance is bigger, less points generated. We suggest to set low resolution when scan large size object for better scanning experience.

Here there are a few ways that you can do this, the fastest way is to know what Graphic Card Model you have installed and search it on CUDA-Enabled GeForce and TITAN Products.

We still had the PC that Shining 3D had lent us for the FreeScan UE Pro review, with the following specifications: Just after we tested Shining 3D’s latest FreeScan UE in July, we eagerly received the all-new Einstar for another exciting review. Format (PLY): Include texture, data type is mesh, saves as Scan, ply, recommended for lows storage needed an easy to edit texture. In terms of time, it took us about 10 minutes for the first project and a little under 5 minutes for the second one (the lion’s underside). The auto alignment was almost instantaneous, auto hole filling took a few seconds, and the texture remapping took about a minute. Moving on to a larger object, a sculpture that is 59 cm high. EinScan-SE took about 35 minutes to complete the scan, while Einstar took only 3 minutes because it has a larger scanning range.