The Golden House: Salman Rushdie

Product Information

Nero's main residence remained the imperial palaces of the Palatine, while the pavilion on the Oppian was used when he preferred to remain in the horti, and the buildings with vestibulum and stagnum were used for feasts, where he received the people of Rome. [34] The cryptoporticus of Nero that connected the palace with the nearby Domus Tiberiana was also part of the complex. It is 130 m long with mosaic floors and elaborate stucco ceiling decoration with vegetal elements and cupids. It lies beneath the Horti Farnesiani along one side of the Domus Tiberiana. [45]

Petya, 40, an agoraphobic, and an alcoholic, and Apu, 41, an attention-seeking artist, were born slightly less than one year apart, they share the same mother, and even the same zodiac sign. Dionysius has no recollection of his mother, and is still a relatively young 22. Eventually, Nero Golden, in his early 70s, brings into their new home a new wife, Vasilisa, a Russian expatriate. Rushdie’s fable is a sprightly portrait of American life from Obama’s election to the rise of Trump. Anthony Gardner, Mail on Sunday Our guide to the Goldens’ world is their neighbor René, an ambitious young filmmaker. Researching a movie about the Goldens, he ingratiates himself into their household. Seduced by their mystique, he is inevitably implicated in their quarrels, their infidelities, and, indeed, their crimes. Meanwhile, like a bad joke, a certain comic-book villain embarks upon a crass presidential run that turns New York upside-down.A. Carandini, The houses of power in ancient Rome, Rome-Bari, Laterza, 2010, ISBN 978-88-420-9422-7 p287 I thank Random House and Salman Rushdie for providing a digital review copy through NetGalley in exchange to an honest review. And while this book was not quite for me, maybe it is for you! Warden, P.G. (1981). "The Domus Aurea Reconsidered". Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians. 40 (4): 271–278. doi: 10.2307/989644. JSTOR 989644. How does one live amongst one’s fellow countrymen and countrywomen when you don’t know which of them is numbered against the sixty-million plus who brought the horror to power, when you can’t tell who should be counted among the ninety-million plus who shrugged and stayed home, or when your fellow Americans tell you that knowing things is elitist and that they hate all elites, ��and then all of that, education, art, music, film, becomes a reason for being loathed, and the creature out of Spiritus Mundi rises up and slouches toward Washington, D.C., to be born. Prospective readers might consider this set-up and become wary over whether this book is for them. Like me, maybe they doubt whether the lives of the powerful and wealthy would be compelling. Maybe through “The Sopranos” and “The Godfather” you believe you have had your fill of exploring the human side of those who struggle to live with their ill-gotten gains. But this is something different. It feels like a true portrait of America as a field of dreams and tragic disappointments, spanning the interval between the election of Obama and that of Trump. As the plot unfolds and Rene crosses the line from observer to a serious participant in the drama and unfolding tragedies in the Golden’s lives, we are embedded a lot of substantive moral choices about how we should live our lives. While being taxed to judge and figure out the characters before me on Rene’s stage, I was delightfully dizzied by all the help proffered from the wise men of history and truth wizards of our current time. Allusions abound in every paragraph—from movies and literature to songs and slogans from popular culture. Instead of cryptic references or obscure allegory that you can encounter with a Nabokov or Joyce, most of such stretches of context and framing are clear and bound well into the lively dialogue and situations of the characters. You may only have a dim conception of, say, the Greek plays of Aristophanes or the movies of Luis Bunuel, but a deftly explained and relevant reference to them is satisfactorily uplifting and edifying for me. It begins to sink in that the issues of lofty figures from Homer or Shakespeare have their counterpart in the lives of the novel’s characters and, in turn, the average reader.

A tonic addition to American—no, world!—literature . . . a Greek tragedy with Indian roots and New York coordinates.” — San Francisco Chronicle The Golden House] is a recognizably Rushdie novel in its playfulness, its verbal jousting, its audacious bravado, its unapologetic erudition, and its sheer, dazzling brilliance. Boston GlobeUnruly but exuberant… Much of the success of The Golden House, in fact, lies in its humour and in the vigour of its storytelling… There is a glowing energy to the prose that makes this Rushdie’s most enjoyable, mischievous and American of novels. Arifa Akbar, Financial Times A sort of Great Gatsby for our time: everyone is implicated, no one is innocent, and no one comes out unscathed, no matter how well padded with cash. Salman Rushdie has garaged the magic carpets and dived deep into 21st-century America, with its concerns about identity, guns, the 1 percent and even superheroes. Jane Henderson, Miami Herald The story's very ambiguity steadily feeds its mysteriousness and power, and Danielewski's mastery of postmodernist and cinema-derived rhetoric up the ante continuously, and stunningly. One of the most impressive excursions into the supernatural in many a year.