Story of the Eye (Penguin Modern Classics)

Product Information

Mr. McElhinney has also presented “Story of the Eye” as a video installation in art galleries, with monitors positioned so that spectators watching one screen can also watch the spectators watching another. Something similar happens even in the screening room, as eyes diverted from the screen encounter other eyes, also looking away in the dark. The Story of the Eyeis a fascinating psychological study and more so on a metaphysical level. The author was an anti-religionist; even so, spiritual questions arise. Are these characters demonically possessed? Insane? Sane in a crazed world? While Georges Bataille’s The Story of the Eyeis hardly sexually arousing, it was such a visceral work it was capable of creating deep emotions within me, whereas pure erotica bores me. Ok, the emotions were not arousal or lust, but revulsion, disgust, pity, rage, and yes, a bit of awe at the writing (which must be incredible in its original French.) Roland Barthes published the original French version of his essay "Metaphor of the Eye" in Bataille's own journal Critique, shortly after Bataille's death in 1962. Barthes' analysis focuses on the centrality of the eye to this series of vignettes, and notices that it is interchangeable with eggs, bulls' testicles and other ovular objects within the narrative. He also traces a second series of liquid metaphors within the text, which flow through tears, cat's milk, egg yolks, frequent urination scenes, blood and semen.

I realized there was a perfect coincidence of images tied to analogous upheavals... I was astonished at having unknowingly substituted a perfectly obscene image for a vision apparently devoid of any sexual implication." In general, the darker the eye colour the more melanin present in the iris. Dark brown eyes have the most melanin, whereas blue eyes have the least. Melanin plays a vital role in protection against the sun, hence why paler-coloured eyes have only evolved in cooler climates. viii + 103 pp. Near fine in illustrated wrappers. Translated by Joachim Neugroschel from the French of the 1928 first edition, but including the closing "Outline of a sequel" from the fourth edition. Bataille's notorious first novel. Cook 183. Second US edition (originally published in the US by Urizen in 1977). Shot on digital video, “Story of the Eye” takes place largely in an old, abandoned house, where the sexual partners get together wordlessly, performing their couplings in a dreamlike daze, as if they were hypnotized by the acts in which they are engaged. The lighting is bright, the colors highly saturated, giving the film an almost clinical look (and indeed, it begins with a long clip of childbirth, apparently lifted from a medical film).Therein lies the major problem with Story of the Eye. I could assure you that I am actually a pretty wanton lass and a great consumer of porn, but it won't matter to people who dug this book. If I didn't dig it (which I didn't), I must be either: What is erotic to me in books, be it literature or trash, has always been the anticipation, the desire for the act, not the technical description of the act itself. To others, the universe seems decent because decent people have gelded eyes. That is why they fear lewdness. They are never frightened by the crowing of a rooster or when strolling under a starry heaven. In general, people savor the "pleasures of the flesh" only on condition that they be insipid.

These are contemptible, loathsome people engaging in the most depraved acts. The perversity here can only lead to insanity, imprisonment, or death. lingam και yoni ως το αιγυπτιακό μάτι, ως τον πανεπόπτη Δία και τον θεό του χριστιανισμού που εικονίζεται επίσης ως οφθαλμός στην χριστιανική εικονογραφία. Το μάτι ακόμα και έξω από το θρησκευτικό του περιτύλιγμα συνέχισε να εμπνέει τους φιλοσόφους καθώς αποτελεί γνωστικό μέσο αποτύπωσης και απόκτησης της ανθρώπινης εμπειρίας. Για παράδειγμα ο Μπέρκλεϋ στο έργο του «δοκίμιο για μια νέα θεωρία της όρασης» αναφέρει: Rose : I hate to admit it, but my relationship with Miles is really getting boring. We even make love the same. To complete this survey of the high summits of my personal obscenity, I must add a final connection I made in regard to Marcelle. It was one of the most disconcerting, and I did not arrive at it until the very end. It is impossible for me to say positively that Marcelle is basically identical with my mother. Such a statement would actually be, if not false, then at least exaggerated. DO NOT READ THIS BOOK IF YOU DON’T WANT TO READ ABOUT THE CHARACTERS QUISSING, SUCQUING AND FUCQUING EACH OTHER AT LEAST 13 TIMES!!!So it appears all of these very unhygienic goings-on are performed by 15 years olds. Why hasn’t this book been busted for underage sex ? Then again, as I could not relate to the imagery used, especially in the sexual exploits, there is a huge part of the story that means nothing to me, and is thus viewed only as a bizarre perversion. I'm certain, however, that those who can relate to the imagery and objects will understand this work on a different level. Not necessarily a more wholesome level, but on a different sexual level.

I wonder why it is such a big no-no with some people. What are they thinking? What do they want us to think?she places the egg inside of her. it is a good feeling. the feeling of life? she places an eyeball inside of her. it is a good feeling. what does that eye see? does it see life, or living death? her opening is an opening; it is literal and figurative; she takes the transgression inside of her and becomes it. The two lovers are transformed, deformed, unrecognizable, "at first glance, solely to my eyes, solely because during that deformation they acquired the lewdest of meanings.” Indeed, staring oneself blind on them would form a quite superficial reading of the text, and does it quite the disservice to my mind. I know this, because initially I was guilty of it myself. Mea culpa. The subtext, the philosophical underpinning someway, somehow escaped my notice, hidden as it was beneath the various, lurid descriptions of the pleasures of the flesh. In the spirit of full transparency I here offer the brief thoughts that I, in a state of slight disappointment scribbled down just moments after finishing the novella: McElhinney’s fourth feature film, Animal Husbandry (2008) is a word-for-word modern dress production of a romantic comedy from the 1930s with the subtext reexamined to explore issues of race, class gender/sexual identity in contemporary America. Anyway, I’m still confused. I don’t see what the big deal is. If it’s legal to do it, why is it illegal to read about it?

I remember that one day, when we were in a car tooling along at top speed,we crashed into a cyclist, an apparently very young and very pretty girl. Her head was almost totally ripped off by the wheels. For a long time, we were parked a few yards beyond without getting out, fully absorbed in the sight of the corpse. The horror and despair at so much bloody flesh, nauseating in part, and in part very beautiful, was fairly equivalent to our usual impression upon seeing one another.” Inspired by the notorious 1928 pornographic novel by Georges Bataille, the patron saint of postmodernism, Andrew Repasky McElhinney’s “Georges Bataille’s Story of the Eye” is a genuine independent film, with no commercial prospects and no economic reason for being. It is a strange, beautiful, disturbing and at times literally painful work, an original and distinctive expression by a gifted young Philadelphia-based filmmaker who here confirms the talent he displayed in his 2001 film, “A Chronicle of Corpses.”alter ego της πεθαίνει, η Σιμόν μπορεί να προχωρήσει σε ολοκληρωμένη σεξουαλική πράξη. Ο Σερ Έντμοντ αποκαθιστά κατά κάποιο τρόπο την σπασμένη τριάδα. Αποτελεί την απαραίτητη σύμβαση ώστε να έχει το ζευγάρι την απαιτούμενη κοινωνική κάλυψη για να συνεχίσουν να υπάρχουν και να ζουν με τον τρόπο που επιθυμούν.Ο έρωτας και ο θάνατος βρίσκουν το αποκορύφωμά τους στις ταυρομαχίες, που σκιαγραφούνται ως μια θανάσιμη ερωτική πράξη: We had abandoned the real world, the one made up solely of dressed people, and the time elapsed since then was already so remote as to seem almost beyond reach. Our personal hallucination now developed as boundlessly as perhaps the total nightmare of human society, for instance, with earth, sky, and atmosphere.